May, 2006

 

 

Records Information Management

First, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, specifically, Rule 17a-4, defines a business record as

Originals of all communications received and copies of all communications sent by such member, broker or dealer (including inter-office memoranda and communications) relating to his business as such.”

It goes on to state such things as the electronic storage media must preserve the records exclusively in a non-rewriteable, non-erasable format and verify automatically the quality and accuracy of the storage media recording process.


The
National Association of Securities Dealers manual also has some interesting ideas, especially in Section 3110. Also, NASD § 3110 defines email as a business record.

The Sedona Principles’ Best Practices Recommendations & Principles for Addressing Electronic Document Production, unlike the NASD and SEC described above, does not define what a business record is directly. Instead it focuses more on the idea that organizations need to create an electronic document preservation program that helps “business units establish practices and customers, tailored to the needs of their businesses, to identify the business records they need to retain”. For this group, a business record is anything falling within the organizationally provided definition.

One last resource I have used as a model is ARMA International. ARMA is a professional organization and is the recognized authority in record management. ARMA was a key contributor to the ISO-15489 international records management standard.


A quote from the ARMA International website:


“It's estimated that more than 90% of the records being created today are electronic. Coupled with the overwhelming growth of electronic messages - most notably e-mail and instant messaging - the management of electronic records has become a critical business issue. How that information is managed has significant business, legal, and technology ramifications. Ultimately, it doesn't matter what medium is used to create, deliver, or store information when determining if content is a record and should be managed accordingly.”

“Records and information are at the core of every transaction any organization undertakes. Therefore any inadequacy in those records and information – including noncompliance with regulations such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and international privacy laws – can threaten the organization’s ability to conduct business. Yet many organizations lack effective policies and procedures for systematic control of recorded information. As a result, they risk extensive penalties for non-compliance with recordkeeping regulations, a tarnished reputation, and possible legal liability. That makes records management one of the most powerful tools in the compliance and risk management arsenal.”

“ISO 15489, the international records management standard, is recognized worldwide as establishing the baseline for excellence in records management programs. Other standards that influence how organizations manage information and records include the U.S. Department of Defense's 5015.2 and MOREQ.”


ARMA International divides records into four categories.

 

1) Vital records are any records that an organization must have to

conduct business and likely could not replace if they were destroyed.

 

2) Important records support an organization’s business operations and,

if destroyed would be replaceable, but only at great cost.

 

3) Useful records are for records that are helpful in conducting business

operations and if they were destroyed, would be easy to replace or the

organization would not greatly feel their loss.

 

4) The final category is nonessential records. This category does not

contain any business records and instead is for any record that has

no predictable value to the organization after their initial use. Records in

this category should be destroyed after use.

 

 

They suggest that special backup and protective measures should be taken for records in categories (1) and (2).

Category (1) and category (2) files are the easiest to define for any organization.

 

Defining which email records suit category (3) may be more complicated and require a definition based on regulations and standards being augmented by organizational policies.

 

Category (4) by default will end up containing email that does not suit the other categories. Examples of such email are announcements and bulletins to employees and their acknowledgements.

 

 

All this has evolved into something called the Unified Compliance Framework.

Here is a chart I found on the Internet showing the UCF structure.

What takes place is the tracking of several hundred regulations, standards, generally accepted principles, and guidelines. This table summarizes the major categories of documents that call for the various types of controls for business record information assurance.